Spam Filter ISP Forums http://www.logsat.com/spamfilter/forums/ This is an XML content feed of; Spam Filter ISP Forums : Last 10 Posts Sat, 04 Feb 2012 04:45:25 +0000 Thu, 02 Feb 2012 08:22:40 +0000 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss Web Wiz Forums 9.61 30 www.logsat.com/spamfilter/forums/RSS_topic_feed.asp Spam Filter ISP Support : Re-Write Subject Header for Whitelisted Emails http://www.logsat.com/spamfilter/forums/forum_posts.asp?TID=7007&PID=14328#14328 Author: yapadu
Subject: Re-Write Subject Header for Whitelisted Emails
Posted: 02 February 2012 at 8:22am

I thought this was a good idea when Matt posted it, I vote for a the beginning in a fashion similar to the way the spam tag is an option.]]> Thu, 02 Feb 2012 08:22:40 +0000 http://www.logsat.com/spamfilter/forums/forum_posts.asp?TID=7007&PID=14328#14328 Spam Filter ISP Support : Re-Write Subject Header for Whitelisted Emails http://www.logsat.com/spamfilter/forums/forum_posts.asp?TID=7007&PID=14327#14327 Author: pcmatt
Subject: Re-Write Subject Header for Whitelisted Emails
Posted: 01 February 2012 at 9:15pm

The only worry I have about suffixing is that some subjects are long and the full subject may not always displayed in all views in the various email clients.  I would think Prefixing would be the way to go.  That way a preview would give the feedback and the user can open the message to get the full subject.]]> Wed, 01 Feb 2012 21:15:15 +0000 http://www.logsat.com/spamfilter/forums/forum_posts.asp?TID=7007&PID=14327#14327 Spam Filter ISP Support : Re-Write Subject Header for Whitelisted Emails http://www.logsat.com/spamfilter/forums/forum_posts.asp?TID=7007&PID=14326#14326 Author: LogSat
Subject: Re-Write Subject Header for Whitelisted Emails
Posted: 01 February 2012 at 8:49pm

That's actually a good idea to have as an option. Would you prefer that tag at the beginning of the subject, or suffixed at the end, for example in brackets, ex. Your Monthly Statement is Ready [WHITELISTED]?]]> Wed, 01 Feb 2012 20:49:43 +0000 http://www.logsat.com/spamfilter/forums/forum_posts.asp?TID=7007&PID=14326#14326 Spam Filter ISP Support : SpamFilter 4.5 beta http://www.logsat.com/spamfilter/forums/forum_posts.asp?TID=7005&PID=14325#14325 Author: LogSat
Subject: SpamFilter 4.5 beta
Posted: 01 February 2012 at 8:48pm

To update this thread, we've not been able to reproduce the problem even with the original emails provided by roaridse. Characters are displaying normally in their original language when received by the new 4.5 beta.]]> Wed, 01 Feb 2012 20:48:18 +0000 http://www.logsat.com/spamfilter/forums/forum_posts.asp?TID=7005&PID=14325#14325 Spam Filter ISP Support : Re-Write Subject Header for Whitelisted Emails http://www.logsat.com/spamfilter/forums/forum_posts.asp?TID=7007&PID=14324#14324 Author: pcmatt
Subject: Re-Write Subject Header for Whitelisted Emails
Posted: 01 February 2012 at 7:59am

I think it would be very useful and helpful to re-write the Subject header (Email Body may be trickier) to provide end users with visual feedback that the email was received because of a whitelist event and it is not spam that SpamFilter simply let through.
 
So the subject:
 
Your Monthly Statement is Ready
 
would be changed to
 
WHITELISTED: Your Monthly Statement is Ready
 
The problem for me is that we ask that users report spam that gets through the filters and users have no way to know that the email they received was whitelisted or not without investigating headers.  This would be a great time saver and streamline our process of making the system more accurate for our users.
 
-Matt 
 
]]> Wed, 01 Feb 2012 07:59:34 +0000 http://www.logsat.com/spamfilter/forums/forum_posts.asp?TID=7007&PID=14324#14324 Spam Filter ISP Support : SpamFilter 4.5 beta http://www.logsat.com/spamfilter/forums/forum_posts.asp?TID=7005&PID=14323#14323 Author: LogSat
Subject: SpamFilter 4.5 beta
Posted: 26 January 2012 at 10:46pm

roaridse,

Do you have access to the original, unmodified source of the email, so we can try to reproduce it? If so, could you please forward it to as at support @ logsat.com in a text/zip attachment so we can take a look?

Thanks!

]]> Thu, 26 Jan 2012 22:46:38 +0000 http://www.logsat.com/spamfilter/forums/forum_posts.asp?TID=7005&PID=14323#14323 Spam Filter ISP Support : SpamFilter 4.5 beta http://www.logsat.com/spamfilter/forums/forum_posts.asp?TID=7005&PID=14322#14322 Author: roaridse
Subject: SpamFilter 4.5 beta
Posted: 25 January 2012 at 8:21am

Hi,

found a mail where the norwegian characters ÆØÅ is rewritten into "?" (for some mails it is rewritten into chinese-alike characters, or just deleted)

According to mailheaders charset on the mail is "us-ascii" - which seems to be incorrect for the actual content:

Received: from spam01.hesby.net (81.29.32.160) by ex03.hesby.net
 (81.29.32.161) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 8.1.436.0; Wed, 25 Jan 2012
 01:30:27 +0100
Received: from 146.xxx.xxx.xxx by spam01.hesby.net (LogSat Software SMTP Server);
 Wed, 25 Jan 2012 01:30:23 +0100
Received: from xxx.xxx.xxx.146.static.xxxxx.com[146.xxx.xxx.xxx]
 (helo=alp-metrow1.appdmz.xxxxx.com) by spam01.hesby.net[81.29.32.160] with
 esmtp (LogSat Software SMTP Server)
Received: from m2s1 (m2s1 [192.168.241.70]) by alp-metrow1.appdmz.xxxxx.com
 (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id q0P0UIkZ019905 for <xxx@xxx.NET>; Wed,
 25 Jan 2012 01:30:18 +0100
Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2012 01:30:18 +0100
From: "Aksess@xxxxx.com" <Aksess@xxxxx.com>
To: <xxx@xxx.com>
Subject: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Description: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
X-SF-RX-Return-Path: <Aksess@xxxxx.com>
X-SF-HELO-Domain: alp-metrow1.appdmz.xxxxx.com
X-SF-Originating-IP: 146.xxx.xxx.xxx
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-ID: <02820706-5310-4455-90a6-d94501b39297@EX03.hesby.net>
Return-Path: Aksess@xxxxx.com
X-MS-Exchange-Organization-Antispam-Report:
 ContentFilterConfigBypassedRecipient
X-MS-Exchange-Organization-SCL: -1

]]> Wed, 25 Jan 2012 08:21:42 +0000 http://www.logsat.com/spamfilter/forums/forum_posts.asp?TID=7005&PID=14322#14322 Spam Filter ISP Support : Multiple email addresses http://www.logsat.com/spamfilter/forums/forum_posts.asp?TID=7006&PID=14321#14321 Author: twarner
Subject: Multiple email addresses
Posted: 24 January 2012 at 3:58pm

Thanks Roberto]]> Tue, 24 Jan 2012 15:58:02 +0000 http://www.logsat.com/spamfilter/forums/forum_posts.asp?TID=7006&PID=14321#14321 Spam Filter ISP Support : Multiple email addresses http://www.logsat.com/spamfilter/forums/forum_posts.asp?TID=7006&PID=14320#14320 Author: LogSat
Subject: Multiple email addresses
Posted: 24 January 2012 at 3:56pm

The sample quarantine web interface used by SpamFilter is very basic, and does not support aliases as-is. It is however relatively simple for a web designer to modify those pages to support aliases (an extra table will probably be required in the database to account for aliases). 
Please note that we fully support SpamFilter even if someone customizes the SpamFilter database to add more functionality as they need, so feel free to make any changes you wish.
]]> Tue, 24 Jan 2012 15:56:35 +0000 http://www.logsat.com/spamfilter/forums/forum_posts.asp?TID=7006&PID=14320#14320 Spam Filter ISP Support : SpamFilter 4.5 beta http://www.logsat.com/spamfilter/forums/forum_posts.asp?TID=7005&PID=14319#14319 Author: LogSat
Subject: SpamFilter 4.5 beta
Posted: 24 January 2012 at 3:52pm

Originally posted by Wayne

Roberto
 As far as I can see it works very well. The GUI looks nice and a bit more modern, sure, but do you have a changelog or any other feature implemented?
 Regards
Hi Wayne,

The change log is pretty simple actually, as no new filtering features or settings have been added. The GUI change is only a "skin" that we applied to try modernizing a bit the looks of the interface while we work on web-enabling it. The major change deals with a major upgrade of the internal SMTP engine used by SpamFilter, but that is all internal "stuff" that is not exposed to the users. Other than immediate, built-in support for TLS in addition to the existing SSL, not much is visible. The new engine supports IPv6, while the old one didn't, so we'll be able to implement it very quickly when the times comes in a few months (we're now focusing on finishing up the new remote GUI).
]]> Tue, 24 Jan 2012 15:52:34 +0000 http://www.logsat.com/spamfilter/forums/forum_posts.asp?TID=7005&PID=14319#14319